SimonMed

Why the star ratings diverge

SimonMed’s online ratings split sharply by how the reviews are gathered. On independent complaint platforms the company clusters at the low end — the Better Business Bureau’s Scottsdale profile carries an active ‘Pattern of Complaints’ alert, with 514 complaints closed over three years and customer reviews averaging about 1.1 out of 5; PissedConsumer sits near 1.5 out of 5 across 635 reviews (about one in ten would recommend); Sitejabber about 1.2; and Yelp about 2.1 across thousands of reviews. By contrast, Google ratings solicited at the point of care — often by kiosk or text at check-out — run far higher, roughly 4.3 to 4.6 with thousands of reviews per location.

Both are shown here rather than cherry-picked; the gap itself is the point. Self-motivated reviewers on independent platforms report a very different experience than the checkout-solicited average. These are opinion aggregations observed in July 2026, not adjudicated facts; complaints filed with the BBB are filed, not proven.


Where this comes from

These are summaries of publicly posted reviews and complaints, linked to their sources. Individual reviews reflect their authors' own experiences and opinions.

← All complaint patterns